Thursday, July 31, 2008
Congressman Pence on Fox News

Congressman Pence took to the cable news airwaves this afternoon to reiterate his request to the President to call a special session of Congress in order to vote on energy legislation which would increase domestic oil exploration.

You can watch the interview HERE.
Congressman Pence urges President to force a special session of Congress
Via CNN:
Top congressional Republicans Thursday called for a special session of Congress to deal with the oil crisis plaguing the country. President Bush called on Congress Wednesday to allow offshore oil drilling, saying the need to lower crude and gas prices made it urgent. Lawmakers are debating legislation to allow drilling for oil along the U.S. coastline, particularly in Florida and California. The Senate, which is set to begin summer recess after this week, has been gridlocked for days on various energy bills. Congressional Republicans said they want an open debate and accuse Democrats of trying to limit amendments to avoid a vote on offshore drilling -- an assertion the Democrats deny. Most Republicans want to lift a 1981 ban on offshore drilling, saying it will increase domestic oil supplies. But the Democratic leadership wants to keep the ban in place, arguing that more offshore drilling will have little effect on prices and could threaten the environment. Republicans also want to legalize drilling for oil in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge in Alaska and allow the processing of oil shale on public lands in the West -- two actions Democrats also oppose. Oil shale is sedimentary rock with oil in it that has historically been considered too expensive to process. Several environmental risks are associated with extracting oil shale. Rep. Mike Pence, R-Indiana, said it's not fair to Americans who "won't get a vacation from high gasoline prices so Congress shouldn't take a vacation until we vote to lessen our dependence on foreign oil." Pence said that if House Speaker Nancy Pelosi wouldn't keep the House in session to vote, he urged the president to call an immediate special session of Congress.
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
On the issue of the 2008 Olympic Games in Beijing...
Congressman Pence, along with other lawmakers, were quote in a Congressional Quarterly article today citing concern with China's record on human rights, particulary brought into focus by the fact that Beijing will be hosting the 2008 Olympic Games...
Meanwhile, some of the strongest condemnations of China are coming from Bush’s fellow Republicans, some of whom are holding nothing back ahead of the president’s historic trip. “The People’s Republic of China is a police state and we should have no other view,” said Indiana Republican Rep. Mike Pence, calling the awarding of the Olympics to Beijing a “historic error.” “Massively violated by the state, it is no wonder more women commit suicide in China than anywhere else in the world,” added Christopher H. Smith, R-N.J. On the Senate side, China critic Sam Brownback, a Republican of Kansas, held a news conference Tuesday to accuse China of plans to spy on hotel guests’ Internet use. “China is the greatest enabler of human rights abuses in the world,” he said. Brownback said foreign-owned hotels approached him with documents showing that Chinese officials forced them to install software to monitor the Internet use of journalists, athletes and other guests.
Senate Fails To Proceed with Federal Media Shield Bill
The Free Flow of Information Act failed on a cloture vote in the Senate. The motion to proceed with debate was defeated 51-43, 9 votes shy of the necessary total to open up debate on the legislation.
The Associated Press wire has it all:
A bill to protect journalists from having to reveal their sources in some federal courts stalled in the Senate on Wednesday, the latest victim of a partisan fight over what to do about gas prices. Republicans blocked the measure, saying the Senate should act instead on an energy bill that would promote more domestic oil and gas production. Democrats wanted to put aside the energy measure to debate and pass the media bill, which would shield reporters from being forced by federal prosecutors to reveal their sources, except in certain circumstances.
Tuesday, July 29, 2008
Support for a federal shield law
Anderson, Indiana's Herald Bulletin became the latest newspaper to endorse the Free Flow of Information Act.
The nation is overdue for a law that, in various forms, is in 49 of 50 states, including Indiana. This federal legislation has been debated for more than three years."While we focus on democracy abroad, we cannot let those freedoms erode at home. The Constitution states that freedom of the press shall not be infringed. A cornerstone of our society is the open market for information that the media share with the public. If the media are hampered from gathering the facts in the first place, they risk becoming little more than conduits for government press releases." Pence and Lugar wrote the above in The Washington Post in April 2005. We’re proud to have two Hoosiers spearheading this important legislation.Let us hope the Senate votes soon to pass the law. It’s certain to face a veto, but the broad bipartisan support should ensure that the country gets a law that will help journalists and whistleblowers disseminate information without fear of reprisal
The number of newspapers to support a federal media shield continues to grow.
Friday, July 25, 2008
Columbus Flood Relief Project
This article appeared in the Columbus Republic today.
REP. Mike Pence, R-Ind., is obviously a very convincing fellow. Just ask members of the Noon Rotary Club of Muncie. If you question them, then check in with members of the Sunrise Rotary Club in Columbus, the local Eastside Community Center and hundreds of people who lived through the Flood of ’08 in Bartholomew County. All of these groups have been brought together by a speech the Columbus native and 6th District member of the U.S. House of Representatives made to the Muncie Rotarians a few days after he toured the flood damaged areas of his hometown. He recounted some of the devastation he had encountered and then asked the Rotarians present to do more than listen. He asked them to reach out to Columbus Rotarians to aid them in the restoration of their town. Even the Columbus Rotarians were surprised at how much the Muncie group wanted to help.
Judiciary Committee Hearing on Impeachment
Congressman Pence participated in a Judiciary Committee hearing today entited "Executive Power and Its Constitutional Limitations." However, most of the discussion seemed to be centered around the topic of impeachment, particularly as it pertained to President George W. Bush.
Congressman Pence's opening statement can be viewed on video HERE, and the transcript can be found HERE (excerpt below):
“We have heard already from the distinguished Ranking Member the arguments against having this hearing and I cannot add to those arguments. These types of hearings take us far down the road of the criminalization of American politics, and I regret that this esteemed committee is taking an issue as important as impeachment and using it to score partisan political points. “Putting those objections aside, I see absolutely no credible basis for impeachment of President Bush. The Associated Press reported on the hearing as did Fox News.
Thursday, July 24, 2008
USA Today
USA Today ran two columns today - one questioning Senator Barack Obama's stance on the surge in Iraq and Senator Joe Biden's response.
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
Congressman Pence presses Attorney General Mukasey on federal media shield
In a Judiciary Committee hearing today, Congressman Pence asked Attorney General Michael Mukasey about the federal media shield bill. Full transcript follows. Watch the video HERE.
The Politico ran a story today about the pending legislation in the Senate.
Broadcasting & Cable also has a story in response to the statements made by the Attorney General at today's hearing.
Congressman Pence: Mr. Attorney General, welcome to the Judiciary Committee.
Attorney General Mukasey: Thank you.
Congressman Pence: Let me take the opportunity to thank you for your exceptional leadership on the recent bipartisan compromise on the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.
Attorney General Mukasey: Thank you.
Congressman Pence: You’ve played an instrumental role in achieving a legislative accomplishment that I believe contributes greatly to our national security.
As you might suspect, since we debated it in one of the nation’s largest newspapers, I want to focus my attention on an issue upon which we disagree: H.R. 2102 – the Free Flow of Information Act. You’ve commented on it earlier and I want to take the opportunity to raise some issues and pursue a line of questioning, but I do so with great respect.

This legislation was introduced about three years ago by myself and my Democrat colleague, Congressman Rich Boucher. You’ve made your opposition very clear in this testimony today and in other public statements. Your written testimony today says that the bill “would endanger national security by making it nearly impossible for us to investigate leaks of even the most sensitive national security information.”
We’re very aware of that. That kind of a strong pronouncement may be somewhat jarring to a committee that very strongly endorsed this legislation and to a Congress that voted 398-21 on October 16, 2007 to endorse this bill. I want to point out for the record, Mr. Attorney General, that this was supported by the Republican and the Democratic Leadership. It was also supported by the Ranking Members of the Intelligence Committee, the Armed Services Committee, and the Chairmen of those Committees.
I think it was supported precisely because we did endeavor to deal thoughtfully and carefully with precisely the issue that seems to be the focal point of your objection. Namely concerns about national security.
As you’re aware, in the legislation, in the House version of the bill we only provided a qualified privilege for journalists and made national security the leading reason for which the shield could be pierced. Our legislation permits compelled disclosure to prevent or identify the perpetrator of an act of terrorism against the United States, to prevent significant and specified harm to national security. You made reference to a child abuse exception not being included in the bill—I would think that would probably be included by inference in the bodily harm exception in our bill, but I know the Senate includes child abuse in their legislation and I’m open to it. It also allows compelled disclosure of sources in cases that involve the unauthorized disclosure of properly classified information that cause or will cause significant or articulable harm to national security.
I think the inclusion of that very careful structure that does, at a point, call upon our judicial branch to exercise discretion—balancing our interest in national security with our interest in preserving the liberties upon which this nation was founded—seems to be a focal point of your concern.
I want to begin by assuring you, General, that as the Congress tried to fulfill its role in addressing both our national security as well as preserving what we’re trying to secure, that we did so in a way that made national security interests truly paramount; which, of course, it comes as no surprise that Congress would act in this case. As you know much better than I, being an authority in the law, 1972 the Branzburg Case, Justice White virtually invited Congress to develop a federal media shield statute saying that Congress had “the freedom to determine whether a statutory newsman’s privilege is necessary and desirable” and to “fashion standards and rules as narrow or as broad as deemed necessary.”
I guess what my question would be, with a little latitude from the Chairman to give you a chance to respond, is—you made the comment today that if ten angels swearing on the Bible wouldn’t change your mind—
 Attorney General Mukasey: No, that’s not what I said. I said it wouldn’t change what’s in the bill.
Congressman Pence: —wouldn’t change what’s in the bill. Well, let me say, if ten angels swearing on the Bible wouldn’t change your view of this bill, would forty American journalists subpoenaed, questioned, or held in contempt do it?
You said Mr. General, if I may, that this is a “solution in search of a problem” and the Justice Department has argued that it’s approved only 19 source-related subpoenas since 1991. However the number does not include the number of subpoenas issued for non-source information. And also, since 2001, at least 19 additional journalists have been subpoenaed by both federal and special prosecutors and you yourself know that Department of Justice guidelines do not apply to civil litigants or special prosecutors.
I would say with respect, this is not a solution in search of a problem, this is a Constitutional, statutory response to a rising erosion of our First Amendment freedom of the press.
Let me make one last point, if I may at the Chairman’s indulgence. I must express some disappointment at the fact that in my three years as a working legislator on this issue—and most of that time you were not in your present role, so I don’t direct this to you—as you speak about the need for language, I don’t believe the Justice Department has ever offered any language to this Committee relative to what would be an acceptable version of a federal media shield statute.

My question to you would be—recognizing that, as you said in your testimony, the Administration has a “Constitutional responsibility to safeguard classified information” and I know you recognize that the Administration has a Constitutional responsibility to protect the Constitution and the First Amendment freedom of the press—can we anticipate, as the Senate may well be taking this bill up in the coming days, may we anticipate a more constructive engagement from the Justice Department in fashioning this legislation in a way that meets the interest of our liberty and our security?
Or should we continue to anticipate as legislators what I would characterize as the strident opposition of the Justice Department to creating the “statutory newsman’s privilege” that the Supreme Court acknowledged could be created 36 years ago?
Attorney General Mukasey: I guess I’m going to ask for both latitude and longitude from the Chair—say a minute, minute and a half—to respond to the six minutes or so that I just heard.
First, three points.
First of all, I’m not questioning anybody’s good faith in the drafting of this legislation—the Congressman’s or anybody else, but I think it’s possible to have a disagreement in good faith.
Congressman Pence: So do I.
 Attorney General Mukasey: Let’s focus on two of the points you mentioned. One that was slightly alighted which was a showing that the information properly classified.
That raises a host of problems—we’re talking about procedurally, substantively—does that require the government to come in and disclose yet more classified information to show that the classified information was properly classified.
A closely related problem is the showing that the danger exceeds the value of disclosure. Passing for a minute that this a complete imponderable, totally imponderable, that would require the government to come in and basically make a bad promise worse by articulating precisely how threatened disclosure could cause yet more harm, I don’t think that’s a solution.
Now, as I said, I’m willing to talk to anybody who’ll talk to me. But we have in place a system that closely restricts the ability to subpoena reports and the ability subpoena source information. I think that system has proved adequate—I’m willing to talk to anybody who thinks it hasn’t. But what I’m not willing to do is to take steps that will essentially do more to protect leakers than it does to protect journalists.
Congressman Pence: I thank the General and I thank the Chairman for his indulgence.
A copy of Attorney General Mukasey's prepared remarks is available HERE.
Model T Centennial Celebration
Ford's Model T recently celebrated its 100th birthday in Richmond, Indiana. Detroit News has more:
But here in the cornfields of eastern Indiana, members of the Ford family and company executives have joined thousands of Ford enthusiasts to remember a better time and a stronger Ford. They have watched as hundreds of Tin Lizzies from 45 states and eight countries roll in for what promises to be the largest gathering of Flivvers in one place since the Highland Park factory closed in 1927. They are hoping to harness some of the passion these antique autos still inspire and make these hobbyists ambassadors for the Ford brand as it faces the toughest fight of its 105-year history. "Henry Ford once said, 'History is more or less bunk.' But the history of this vehicle and the history of this great American is none of that," said Congressman Mike Pence, R-Ind., who helped open the festivities Monday night. "We celebrate not just a great American technological accomplishment, but we celebrate the values, the determination, the entrepreneurial spirit that made it possible." The Richmond Palladium-Item also published a story on the celebration.
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Columbus Regional Hospital
Congressman Pence has joined other Indiana Representatives in writing a letter to Secretary of Labor Elaine Chao on behalf of Columbus Regional Hospital - asking that "Columbus Regional be paid the amount of money that employees would have received if they had filed for unemployment benefits."
The Columbus Republic published a front page story on it, which can be found HERE:
"It was the right decision for CRH to keep paying these employees," Pence said. "It deployed 1,800 people into the community to help neighbors and not have to worry about where their next meal will come from." Pence said the hospital deserves reimbursement, partly because CRH’s decision to pay employees has kept them from collecting unemployment payments. He expects the federal government to decide within two weeks. Both WRTV Channel 6 and WTHI Channel 10 have more.
Monday, July 21, 2008
Energy Crisis Press Conference
Today, Congressman Pence, along with Congressman Burton and Congressman Buyer participated in a joint press conference calling on Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi to allow a vote on an energy bill that would allow more domestic drilling.
WISH TV was there and reported on it.
Three of the four representatives met at a truck dealership to talk about the current energy crisis. The lawmakers argue, if the United States is serious about lowering energy costs and oil dependency than Congress must pass a bill for the president to sign. A bill that allows drilling on the outer continental shelf, as well as, Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge. Video of the press conference is available HERE.
WTHR Channel 13 has more.
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
'Free Our Oil'
Declares a Wall Street Journal editorial today:
With Mr. Bush's belated decision yesterday, Congress's moratorium on offshore drilling is now the last major political barrier to increasing domestic oil-and-gas production. Yet Democratic leaders have refused to schedule even a single hearing on the topic.
Monday, July 14, 2008
President lifts executive ban on offshore drilling
President Bush lifted a ban on offshore drilling today that has been in place since President George H.W. Bush was in office. Congressman Pence issued a statement in response.
Bush says offshore drilling could yield up to 18 billion barrels of oil over time, although it would take years for production to start. Bush also says offshore drilling would take pressure off prices over time. In addition, the president has proposed opening the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge for drilling, lifting restrictions on oil shale leasing in the Green River Basin of Colorado, Utah and Wyoming and easing the regulatory process to expand oil refining capacity.
The Dangers of the 'Fairness Doctrine'
...are fleshed out in an article in the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, with Matt Lloyd, the Congressman's spokesman, quoted:
"All it takes is one appointment to the FCC of someone who would want to bring this back and there you go," said Matt Lloyd, spokesman for Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., a former talk radio host who is leading the legislative crusade against the return of the doctrine… Still, Mr. Pence and some of his Republican colleagues think the Fairness Doctrine is enough of a threat to require pre-emptive action. One year ago, Mr. Pence introduced the Broadcaster Freedom Act, which Mr. McCain co-sponsored, but Ms. Pelosi has declined to schedule a vote on the bill. Mr. Pence is currently gathering signatures for a discharge petition to force the bill onto the floor of the House. When asked about claims that Democrats would not seek to reinstate the doctrine if they won the presidency in 2008, Mr. Lloyd, the Pence spokesman, said he did not buy them. "You could count me, along with a number of other Republicans, skeptical," he said. In particular, talk of increased "broadcast localism" has raised hackles. Some say such policies would have the same end as the Fairness Doctrine. "Localism is a stealth Fairness Doctrine," Mr. Lloyd said.
Saturday, July 12, 2008
Pence statement on passing of Tony Snow
Congressman Pence released the following statement today regarding the passing of former White House press secretary Tony Snow: "Tony Snow's passing is a national loss. His intellect, his decency and his professionalism set a high standard for conservatives in public service and journalism. America will miss his voice and I will miss a friend."
Friday, July 11, 2008
Congressman Pence on Iran
Congressman Pence appeared on C-SPAN's Washington Journal program yesterday to discuss the recent developments in Iran and how the United States should respond. The video is available HERE.
In Case You Missed It:
The Washington Times has an editorial on the 'Fairness Doctrine' and Congressman Pence's efforts to ban it forever.
To put the matter to rest once and for all, Rep. Mike Pence's Broadcaster Freedom Act emerged last June to formally prohibit the FCC from ever repromulgating the doctrine. The Indiana Republican, himself a former radio host, is this bill's ideal spokesman. But it has languished in committee. At present, a discharge petition to bring a vote has garnered 196 signatures. Two-hundred eighteen votes are needed. Of the 309 House members who approved the one-year moratorium attached to the financial-services bill, approximately 100 have not signed the petition. Not surprisingly, the flip-floppers fall along partisan lines. But it's worth reminding these newly minted "Fairness Democrats" that it wasn't so long ago that they rightly abhorred government censorship of the airwaves.
Tuesday, July 08, 2008
Paul Weyrich on the "Fairness Doctrine"
Paul Weyrich, the Chairman and CEO of the Free Congress Foundation, wrote an opinion piece about the dangers of 'broadcast localism' because it would amount to the 'stealth enactment of the Fairness Doctrine.'
The article, published on July 3 in The Washington Times, can be found HERE.
Monday, July 07, 2008
Pence on drilling
Congressman Pence appeared on Fort Wayne television last week to talk about drilling. The folks at ABC/NBC in Fort Wayne have the story here.
Fairness Doctrine update
In a clear sign that the movement is gaining steam, newspapers across the country are weighing in with editorials. Here are a few that ran within the past couple of days: Rocky Mountain News Here's hoping a handful of Democrats break ranks and put free speech above party loyalty. President Bush would surely sign Pence's bill. And Sen. John McCain, the presumptive Republican nominee, is a sponsor of the Senate version. Daily Herald (Utah) But this isn't a complex issue that requires deep study. It's very simple and clear: Reviving the Fairness Doctrine would be a flagrant attempt to stifle free speech for the benefit of a political party that is not now, and may never be, very popular in broadcast programming. Augusta Chronicle Democratic nominee-to-be Barack Obama has said he "doesn't support" the Fairness Doctrine. But that's different from opposing it. It's possible the tepid "doesn't support it" could change or simply yield under pressure from his Democratic colleagues. And, as columnist and Phoenix radio talk show host Austin Hill notes, Obama once was a huge proponent of spending limits under public financing of presidential campaigns -- until he found he could raise a lot of money and spend it with no limits. White House weighs in In addition, the White House weighed in last week, with White House Press Secretary Dana Perino saying the President supports the Broadcaster Freedom Act and Congressman Pence’s efforts to bring it to the floor for a vote. Human Events has the story here. Excerpt: Perino did not rule out helping Pence round up the signatures he needs to get his measure out of committee. When I asked if the President or other Administration officials would help Pence in getting the required signatures on the discharge petition, she replied: “I’ll see if there’s anything [the] legislative affairs office [in the White House] is working on in that regard.” Discharge Petition update The discharge petition currently has 196 signatures. Only 22 more are needed to bring the Broadcaster Freedom Act to the floor for a vote. Click here for a list of signatures (note: some Members on this list may not be serving any longer, hence the different total).
Wednesday, July 02, 2008
Muncie Star Press: "Broadcaster Freedom Act deserves a vote"
The Muncie Star Press has a great editorial talking about the need to pass the Broadcaster Freedom Act here.
Tuesday, July 01, 2008
Pence blog from Israel
Meetings with Israeli and Palestinian Prime Ministers July 1, 2008 Jerusalem, Israel After a month of weather-related disasters across my congressional district, it wasn't easy to board a plane to Israel for a long-planned series of diplomatic meetings, but the current negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian Authority and the rising threat of Iran and its agents in Hamas and Hezbollah convinced me that I should go. My duties as the Ranking Republican on the Middle East and South Asia Subcommittee of the House Committee on Foreign Affairs include regular briefings on the status of Israel and regional issues, but there is no substitute for a firsthand look. Despite an ongoing crisis in Hamas-controlled Gaza, prisoner swaps with Hezbollah in Lebanon, and the nuclear ambitions of Iran, the peace process that began last fall at the Annapolis Conference has been the primary topic of our discussions. The Annapolis Conference was preceded by seven bloody years and it was met with skepticism and concern by many of Israel's allies in Congress, me included. As much as I long for peace in the Holy Land, the history of negotiations has shown that as Israel has offered peace, past Palestinian leaders have responded only with unreasonable demands and violence. The hope of the President and U.S. State Department has been that the new Palestinian leadership would be different. And, while you haven't heard much about the negotiations between Israelis and Palestinians, we were informed by both sides that negotiations are taking place. Our delegation of five congressmen met with numerous officials, including Israeli Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and the Prime Minister of the Palestinian Authority, Salam Fayyad. While both officials seemed earnest in their desire to achieve some peaceful solution, I left our meetings doubtful that the time is right. On the Israeli side, Prime Minister Olmert is a resilient and forceful public figure. As I saw during our meeting prior to the Annapolis Conference, this Israeli Prime Minister believes strongly in the Annapolis process and he makes his case with an upbeat determination. He repeated that same presentation during our one-hour meeting in the Israeli cabinet room. And yet, the government of Prime Minister Olmert came to power under Ariel Sharon by promoting the now failed 2005 policy of disengagement from Gaza. His government is also beset by widely publicized allegations of corruption and public disapproval following the disappointing outcome for the Israeli military in Lebanon in 2006. These factors also represent significant hurdles to achieving an agreement that would be in the interest of the state of Israel. On the Palestinian side, Prime Minister Salam Fayyad comes across as soft-spoken and professional. However, Hamas is still in complete control of Gaza and, as I stated to Prime Minister Fayyad, Palestinian education and culture continue to promote anti-Semitic attitudes. The dominance of Hamas and the culture of hatred toward Israel represent immense barriers to even a well-intentioned effort by the Palestinian Authority. As we prepare to lift off in a helicopter in Tel Aviv for a strategic tour of the entire state of Israel, I am not without hope. I pray for the peace of Jerusalem and for all the people of this ancient land. As I said in 2007, “Significant progress in the Israeli-Palestinian peace process cannot be made at bayside press briefings in American cities. The real progress has to come on the ground in Israel, in the Palestinian territories, and in the hearts and minds of Israelis and Palestinians. “Real progress will not come from additional acts that exchange the tangible security of Israel for intangible promises of future Palestinian action. Only genuine, thorough and recurring antiterror, pro-democratic actions should yield peace and eventual Palestinian statehood.”
I remain convinced of two things. First, Israel is a small democracy and an ally of unique importance that must be defended. And second, any chance for a just and lasting peace must begin, first and foremost, with the interests of the Jewish state of Israel. U.S. Rep. Mike Pence (IN-6) Jerusalem, Israel
|
 |
 |
 |
Archives
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
|