Home   /   Mike's Blog

Thursday, May 15, 2008


Select Committee || Farm Bill
The Hill has a wrap-up piece on the Select Committee's hearing yesterday:

Republicans grew frustrated with House Democratic floor aides — and indicated they found much of their testimony implausible — during a second, sometimes contentious day of hearings on the so-called “stolen” vote of Aug. 2, 2007.

While Tuesday’s hearing was marked by a consensus that the Democrats’ rule banning the holding open of votes for the sole purpose of reversing the outcome is unenforceable, Wednesday’s final day of public hearings on roll call vote 814 was marked by partisan divisions.

“Despite the fact that Majority Leader Hoyer clearly stated to Ms. O’Neill that he wanted the vote closed, we remain frustrated that she has no recollection,” Pence said following the hearing.

“Which is why we believe that the evidence supports our conclusion that, one, Republicans won the motion to recommit and, two, the Democratic leadership pressured the chair,” Pence added.

“Our ideal outcome is, at best, for one member of the majority on the panel to join us in our description of what happened that night,” Pence said. “What we’re struggling with here as the minority is adding things up that don’t quite add up.”


The Farm Bill was passed out of the House yesterday and a couple Indiana papers had the scoop:

The Indianapolis Star reports:

Most Indiana lawmakers voted for a $300 billion farm and nutrition bill that would expand food help for the poor but doesn’t go as far as the White House wanted in limiting subsidies to wealthy farmers.

The 318-106 House vote today was enough to override a threatened presidential veto.

Indiana’s five House Democrats and GOP Reps. Steve Buyer and Mark Souder voted for the bill, while GOP Reps. Dan Burton and Mike Pence opposed it. Indiana is agriculture," Pence said. "But Hoosiers on and off the farm also believe in fiscal discipline and reform."


And the Journal Gazette added:

The House defied a veto threat Wednesday and passed a bill promoted as a way to cut grocery prices, feed hungry people and help the U.S. reduce its reliance on foreign oil.

Its critics said the $290 billion outline for the next five years of agriculture policy is too expensive and gives too much money to wealthy farmers and landowners.

A year and a half in the making, the bill provides money for food stamps and other nutrition programs, conservation, ethanol research and subsidies for farmers and landowners.

The subsidy provision is the most controversial, drawing rebukes from lawmakers such as Rep. Mike Pence, R-6th, who said it was irresponsible.


Archives

March 2004  
April 2004  
May 2004  
June 2004  
July 2004  
August 2004  
September 2004  
October 2004  
November 2004  
December 2004  
January 2005  
February 2005  
March 2005  
April 2005  
May 2005  
June 2005  
July 2005  
August 2005  
September 2005  
October 2005  
November 2005  
December 2005  
January 2006  
February 2006  
March 2006  
April 2006  
May 2006  
June 2006  
July 2006  
August 2006  
September 2006  
October 2006  
November 2006  
December 2006  
January 2007  
February 2007  
March 2007  
April 2007  
May 2007  
June 2007  
July 2007  
August 2007  
September 2007  
October 2007  
November 2007  
December 2007  
January 2008  
February 2008  
March 2008  
April 2008  
May 2008  
June 2008  
July 2008  

Biography | District Profile | News Center | Mike's Calendar | Issue Center | Constituent Services | Photo Album | Kids Page | Contact | Privacy Policy