Thursday, April 17, 2008
Media Shield
Media shield was in the news today with multiple editorials published regarding its merits.
Robert Novak's column in the Washington Post today.
The bad news last week for conservative Republican Rep. Mike Pence was private confirmation that his proposed law protecting journalists from runaway judges was opposed by President George W. Bush himself, not just inflexible Justice Department lawyers. The good news this week for Pence was an unexpected endorsement by Bush's successor heading the Republican Party, John McCain.
…Journalists generally are not popular with conservative Republicans such as Pence, an evangelical Christian and former chairman of the conservative Republican Study Committee, who challenged the party establishment last year in running for minority leader. Pence summarized his commitment to shield legislation in a two-minute speech he delivered to the House on March 12.
...Pence would like to make that case face to face with Bush. But this president is not easy to see, even for a prominent congressman of his own party, and Pence may have to settle for a senior aide. Nevertheless, Pence is hard to discourage and still wants that meeting to enlist his president in helping Congress pass what supporters say would be its first press freedom legislation since the Bill of Rights. San Francisco Chronicle's editorial.
The long struggle for a federal law that allows journalists to protect the identity of confidential sources received two significant boosts this week.
The House version, by Rep. Mike Pence, R-Ind., was passed on a 398-21 vote, which suggests enough support to override a potential Bush veto. The endorsement of the three major presidential candidates should serve as a further prod to the Senate to get to work. Americans should not have to wait for the inauguration of a new president for Congress to protect the public's right to know. USA Today's editorial and a response from Attorney General Michael Mukasey.
The law is needed, quite simply, to ensure that reporters can keep watch on government and other powerful interests. To do that, reporters sometimes need to promise confidentiality to whistle-blowers and others with valuable information; those sources, in turn, need to be able to speak without fear of reprisal.
The House passed a federal shield law last fall, 398-21. The measure, says co-sponsor Mike Pence, R-Ind., one of the most conservative congressmen, "is not about protecting reporters, it's about protecting the public's right to know." A Senate bill is also gathering bipartisan support. Attorney General Michael B. Mukasey argues below that a shield law is nnecessary (because information is flowing freely without one) and dangerous (because a new law could undermine all sorts of investigations, including those of terrorism).
|
 |
 |
 |
Archives
March 2004
April 2004
May 2004
June 2004
July 2004
August 2004
September 2004
October 2004
November 2004
December 2004
January 2005
February 2005
March 2005
April 2005
May 2005
June 2005
July 2005
August 2005
September 2005
October 2005
November 2005
December 2005
January 2006
February 2006
March 2006
April 2006
May 2006
June 2006
July 2006
August 2006
September 2006
October 2006
November 2006
December 2006
January 2007
February 2007
March 2007
April 2007
May 2007
June 2007
July 2007
August 2007
September 2007
October 2007
November 2007
December 2007
January 2008
February 2008
March 2008
April 2008
May 2008
June 2008
July 2008
August 2008
|